Trunk Injections are Never the Answer

Corporate Driven Research

Trunk injections were introduced to the tree care industry with the promise of precision and science. The idea was simple: drill into the tree, inject a measured dose of insecticide or fungicide directly into its vascular system, and achieve fast, targeted protection. On paper, it sounds brilliant. In practice, it has become one of the most damaging trends in modern tree care.

The Problem with Holes and Hype

Every injection starts with a wound. To deliver the chemical, holes must be drilled into the tree’s trunk — directly through its protective bark and into the living tissue that moves water and nutrients. Trees do not heal these wounds; they compartmentalize them. Each new round of injections adds more holes, more compartments, and more stress. Over time, the tree’s ability to transport water, nutrients, and defense compounds declines — and what began as a “treatment” becomes a slow death sentence.

When Science Turns into Sales

Insects like the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) can be effectively managed through multiple methods: soil drenches, basal sprays, or even systemic root uptake applications that do not harm the tree’s structure. These methods cost less, are faster to apply, and do not leave behind permanent wounds.

A single trunk injection treatment for a 20-inch diameter Ash tree can cost around $450 and is marketed as “two years of protection.” Meanwhile, proven soil or basal methods can provide the same level of control for about $60 over the same period.

That math is not the solution — it’s the enemy of preservation. Trunk injections created a profit model that pushed accessibility out of reach for many property owners. Instead of saving trees, the system priced out most people and left countless untreated trees vulnerable to infestation and removal.

Slowing Down the Fight

During EAB outbreaks, speed matters. The more trees you can protect early, the fewer will be lost. Trunk injections complicate this process — they’re slow, labor-intensive, and require specialized equipment. A single technician can treat dozens of trees with a soil or basal application in a day; injections may only cover a fraction of that number. While the industry focused on high-dollar treatments, the insects kept spreading — and thousands of Ash trees died waiting for help.

Bad Practice Unchecked

I’ve seen Tree problems that a homeowner could fix on their own, I was talking to a peer last week and he told me that he had just come from a house that needed little to no service but a large nationwide Tree Company told her she needed to fertilize her Trees with Trunk Injections. Cost was over $15,000

That is malpractice, bad incetivization, and just wrong. (Why do you think Private Equity is getting into Trees?) Those Trees would get no benefit from the Injections that were presenrted as the solution. They would be a great benefit for the Salesman and the company he worked for, the homeowner would have lost both monwey and trees. She was smart to call for a second opinion. The real solution (good advice) cost $150.

The Lesson: Keep It Simple

Tree preservation should be practical, scalable, and biology-based — not marketing-driven. The health of our urban forests depends on accessible, science-backed solutions that protect as many trees as possible.

Trunk injections may look technical and sophisticated, but sometimes the simplest methods are the most effective, least invasiver, and reasonable in price. 

The Truth About Trunk Injections

I’ve seen a lot of things come and go in this industry, but nothing worse than the rise of Trunk Injections.

Trunk injections require drilling holes into a tree and setting up a pressurized IV system to push products directly into the tree’s vascular system. It looks highly technical and scientific—but in reality, it’s completely unnecessary.




The Aspen – Plant a Grove Not a Tree

The Aspen – Plant a Grove Not a Tree

When I’m called out to assess an Aspen in a new client’s landscape, the tree under stress is almost always planted as a single tree. That’s where the trouble begins.

Aspens are not meant to live alone — they’re communal by nature. Think of them like herd animals. If you’ve ever had a single horse kept in isolation, you understand: it gets anxious, deteriorates, and doesn’t thrive. Aspen trees behave the same way. They are genetically wired to live in communities — groves — and when isolated (planted by itself), they become exponentially more vulnerable to both biotic (living threats like pests and disease) and abiotic (non-living stresses like drought or heat) pressures.

In a native setting, Aspen groves form a connected root system. As the roots spread, they come into contact with other Aspen roots and begin fusing. This connection provides tremendous benefits — they share all their resources, their natural defense becomes more efficient, inducing resistance to insects and pathogens. It even helps build a more resilient genetic diversity through the emergence of new clones. One Aspen tree standing alone doesn’t have any of this support — and it shows. Lone Aspen trees almost always decline prematurely, while groves (not trees) can live for centuries.

In the landscape, however, we often treat Aspen as ornamentals. We plant them individually for their beautiful white bark and shimmering leaves, especially along driveways or as focal points. But that aesthetic decision usually sets the tree up for failure. Especially here in the Wasatch, where disease pressures are high, stand-alone Aspens are easy targets.

Aspens in our region frequently suffer from fungal issues like Marssonina or Septoria Leaf Spot — common but manageable in groves. The bigger threat is Cytospora Canker, which is devastating to single trees. Once the disease is established, there’s no synthetic cure available. Cytospora takes out well over half of the single Aspens I’m called to inspect, simply because they lack the natural support network of a grove.

Managing a grove is much easier also, loss of single or multiple trees is built in to the expectations. Those disease issues can, and will always be present, but in a grove, any loss is easier to take. The solution is already in progress with the many clones coming up, the Tree will be replaced. Nature has a plan in place. Problems arise only when we want something that goes against that plan.

Stand Alone Trees are great in a Landscape, and there are plenty of Species that thrive when planted alone. In Park CIty there is not a lot of tree diversity to begin with, but that is usually the Landscaper that brings that narrow view to the table. Though there are not many, we do have Trees on the Wasatch Back that grow well on their own, including Crab Apple, Choke Cherry, and several native Maple species. I’ve seen Locust, Red Bud, Plum, Apricot, FLowering Pear, and a few Bur Oaks, grow with success here. They just require a little more planning and thought.

The Takeaway:  

Don’t plant Aspen Trees. Plant Aspen groves.

A grove can tolerate loss because it’s constantly renewing itself through sucker shoots (called clones). If left alone, those clones will grow into new stems and help maintain the health and continuity of the group. Over time, the strongest genetics suited to your microclimate will dominate and thrive.

Aspen groves are incredibly resilient when allowed to function naturally. But one Aspen, alone in the landscape, is a tree waiting to fail.

Why So Many Voles in Park City?

Why So Many Voles in Park City?

Do Arborists get a Free Pass?

Do Arborists get a Free Pass?

Trees hold a very unique place in the hearts of people anywhere on the planet. People love trees because they embody the essence of life, beauty, and resilience. Trees provide shade on sunny days, clean the air we breathe, and serve as habitat for countless creatures, making them indispensable to our environment. Their wide roots and towering branches inspire awe and symbolize strength and stability, while their seasonal changes remind us of the cycles of life and renewal. Trees also evoke emotional connections—memories of climbing them as children, relaxing under their canopies, or planting one to mark a special occasion. Beyond their practical benefits, trees offer a sense of peace and connection to nature, serving as quiet witnesses to our lives and steadfast companions in an ever-changing world. This deep affection for trees often extends—sometimes too easily—to those who work with them: The Arborist.  

 

Because the love people feel for trees automatically spills over to anyone associated with their care. An arborist doesn’t have to do much to earn this admiration; it’s almost automatic. People assume that someone who works with trees must share their love for them. In a way, it’s as if the arborist inherits the goodwill that tree love naturally creates.  

 

That unearned respect can be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it helps arborists build trust and rapport with clients more easily. People are inclined to believe that arborists have their trees’ best interests at heart, simply because they’ve chosen this profession. That should not be the case. The love for trees can and does become a shield for us from scrutiny or criticism, even when our methods or intentions do not align with the health and longevity of the trees we are hired to care for.

 

This automatic trust is (at times) not at all deserved in our industry. Not all arborists share the same dedication to tree health. Many may prioritize profit over preservation, offering services that are more about quick fixes with better margins (ex: unnecessary removals, Trunk Injections) than long-term care. Our solutions are increasingly about simplification, and margin. Yet, because people assume the best about anyone working with trees, these practices often go unchallenged.  

This phenomenon highlights the importance of looking beyond the label of “Certified Arborist” to ensure that the person entrusted with your trees genuinely understands and respects their needs. Trees may automatically grant arborists a share of their love and goodwill, but it’s up to the arborist to prove they are deserving of it through expertise, ethical practices, and true commitment to the health of the trees they care for.  

In the end, the love for trees should inspire both arborists and tree owners to work together to protect these majestic giants—not as a free pass, but as a shared responsibility.